The Oscars show was a success … no, really

Surveying the glittery chaos of Oscar night, ABC took a common approach: Declare victory.
The ratings “skyrocketed,” the network said. So did the social-media responses; this was the biggest entertainment special in two years.
That’s true … sort of. I’d also add that the show was an overall success; sucker-punch aside, it had clever hosts (shown here), strong music and, as usual, a few flaws. But first, those numbers: Read more…

Surveying the glittery chaos of Oscar night, ABC took a common approach: Declare victory.

The ratings “skyrocketed,” the network said. So did the social-media responses; this was the biggest entertainment special in two years.

That’s true … sort of. I’d also add that the show was an overall success; sucker-punch aside, it had clever hosts (shown here), strong music and, as usual, a few flaws. But first, those numbers:

The night averaged 16.6 million viewers, ABC said (quoting Nielsen numbers), a 58-percent jump over last year’s 10.4 million. In the hard-to-reach 18-to-49 age group, it had 3.8 million, a 73-percent jump. That makes it No. 1 (sports excluded) for the season. It also drew 22.7 million social-media uses, a 139-percent jump.

All of that is fine, but remember:

— Last year’s telecast was the nadir, with its 10.4 million viewers. This year’s 16.6 looks splendid, if you don’t compare it to 2020 (23.6 million) or 2019 (29.6) … or 1998, when “Titanic” ruled (57.2).

— You can always expect social-media comments if one millionaire assaults another. People feel compelled to say something, if just “Whaaaa?!?”

That moment – Will Smith smacking Chris Rock, who had told a mild joke about Smith’s wife’s bald head – was absurd. So was Smith’s explanation — apparently borrowed from some previous century – that he was “protecting” his wife. (For future reference: Jada Pinkett Smith, a savvy actress and producer, doesn’t need some self-assigned knight to protect her.)

It distracted from many things … including the fact that Smith won an Oscar for his performance in “King Richard.” The movie (which he produced) and the performance were everything that his Oscar-night behavior wasn’t – nuanced, humane and intelligent.

But this also distracted from the big jump in Oscar-show quality. After three awful years with no host, we suddenly had three of them, Amy Schumer, Wanda Sykes and Regina Hall; Schumer’s mini-monolog was especially good.

And after exiling the music to the preview show last year, we had five strong songs. Think of it this way: Super Bowl viewers had to wait until halftime for Beyonce; at the Oscars, we got her right away.

We also got Billie Eilish, albeit without her green hair. (Apparently, all the yellowish-green had been used up in Beyonce’s opening number.) Alongside some overlong speeches and unneeded throwback moments, we got lots of entertainment. And no sucker punch can knock that out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *